Mar 27, 2016 - I went searching around for a similar question - the way I've managed to initialize a Git repository for an existing project file is this (disclaimer: this is done in. Using Git with Visual Studio [closed]. (and github) and will never look back. And you are a lot more aware of what the other contributors to your project have. I have been using Visual Studio and git for two years now. I would say that the best solution to this problem is to just use a separate source control application like Atlassians SourceTree. It's free, easy to install, has a good GUI and is user friendly, you can browse multiple repositories(aka different projects) just like you would browse the web in Chrome, and, most importantly, support multiple source control systems. Give it a try! You wont be disappointed, I assure you! – Nov 5 '14 at 16:30 •. I use Git with Visual Studio for my port of Protocol Buffers to C#. I don't use the GUI - I just keep a command line open as well as Visual Studio. For the most part it's fine - the only problem is when you want to rename a file. However, Bit.AI takes the lead compared to Google Docs when it comes to the flexibility of options related to sharing. Best google docs app for mac download. On the dashboard, admins can manage or control all of the activities of the users invited to collaborate. Both Git and Visual Studio would rather that they were the one to rename it. I think that renaming it in Visual Studio is the way to go though - just be careful what you do at the Git side afterwards. Avery media software for mac pro. It includes shapes, curved text tools, borders, background colors, more than 1,300 pre-designed layouts and more than 2,000 clip art and photo images you can use in your designs. Although this has been a bit of a pain in the past, I've heard that it actually should be pretty seamless on the Git side, because it can notice that the contents will be mostly the same. (Not entirely the same, usually - you tend to rename a file when you're renaming the class, IME.) But basically - yes, it works fine. I'm a Git newbie, but I can get it to do everything I need it to. Make sure you have a git ignore file for bin and obj, and *.user. I've looked into this a bit at work (both with Subversion and Git). Visual Studio actually has a source control integration API to allow you to integrate third-party source control solutions into Visual Studio. However, most folks don't bother with it for a couple of reasons. The first is that the API pretty much assumes you are using a locked-checkout workflow. There are a lot of hooks in it that are either way expensive to implement, or just flat out make no sense when you are using the more modern edit-merge workflow. The second (which is related) is that when you are using the edit-merge workflow that both Subversion and Git encourage, you don't really need Visual Studio integration. The main killer thing about SourceSafe's integration with Visual Studio is that you (and the editor) can tell at a glance which files you own, which must be checked out before you can edit, and which you cannot check out even if you want to. Then it can help you do whatever revision-control voodoo you need to do when you want to edit a file. None of that is even part of a typical Git workflow. When you are using Git (or SVN typically), your revision-control interactions all take place either before your development session, or after it (once you have everything working and tested). At that point it really isn't too much of a pain to use a different tool. You aren't constantly having to switch back and forth. I find that Git, working on whole trees as it does, benefits less from IDE integration than source control tools that are either file based or follow a checkout-edit-commit pattern. Of course there are instances when it can be nice to click on a button to do some history examination, but I don't miss that very much. The real must-do is to get your.gitignore file full of the things that shouldn't be in a shared repository. Mine generally contain (amongst other stuff) the following: *.vcproj.*.user *.ncb *.aps *.suo but this is heavily C++ biased with little or no use of any class wizard style functionality. My usage pattern is something like the following. • Code, code, code in Visual Studio. • When happy (sensible intermediate point to commit code, switch to Git, stage changes and review diffs. If anything's obviously wrong switch back to Visual Studio and fix, otherwise commit. Any merge, branch, rebase or other fancy SCM stuff is easy to do in Git from the command prompt. Visual Studio is normally fairly happy with things changing under it, although it can sometimes need to reload some projects if you've altered the project files significantly. I find that the usefulness of Git outweighs any minor inconvenience of not having full IDE integration but it is, to some extent, a matter of taste.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |